Read lately...
Feb. 9th, 2006 08:26 pmI'm sitting with an enormous box of tissues to hand, and a healthy dose of self-pity (for very little just cause) and interrupting the typing from time to time to sneeze all over the place...
Just finished Mrs Frisby and the Rats of NIMH, which was the first of the upcoming course books I picked up to read/reread. It was fun, and the critique of (human) society more pointed than I might have expected from a v. popular children's book written in 1971 (though no equivalent feminist awareness!), but not so sure I see quite why it won the Newbery Medal. Yet. It may or may not become apparent later. But mid-way through I suddenly noticed how surprisingly many of the books are anthropomorphic: Watership Down; Aesop's Fables; The Wind in the Willows; The Mouse and his Child; The Jungle Book, Winnie the Pooh, Mrs. Frisby, Black Beauty, Blitzcat (I think, from reading the description on Amazon - don't know about Yaxley's Cat) and Charlotte's Web. That's leaving out the Potter and other picture books, which are more often talking animals/dolls/whatever, I'd have thought. 10 out of 14, and possibly 11. Yet there's no other type of fantasy immediately apparent, and just the one science fiction. And there's plenty of fantasy in later courses. Okay - that was stupid, as there are collections of fairy tales, but nothing else in the chapter books.
Want to take on DWJ on Hilary McKay's Permanent Rose, but now is clearly not the time, no matter how much absencia she might be in. Instead I'll content myself with an entirely apropos quote about appropriate children's reading from Moominpappa's Memoirs, which I'm reading thanks to
myntti and
generalblossom (and madybooks too). It's just wonderful. The Mymble asks her children where they stopped in their bedtime reading, and gets this answer:
The children chorused, '"This - is - One-eyed - Bob's - sanguinary - work" - remarked - Inspector - Twiggs - pulling - a - three-inch - nail - from - the - ear - of - the - corpse - "it - must - have - happened" ---'
Quite, quite, as the Mymble said in response...
Just finished Mrs Frisby and the Rats of NIMH, which was the first of the upcoming course books I picked up to read/reread. It was fun, and the critique of (human) society more pointed than I might have expected from a v. popular children's book written in 1971 (though no equivalent feminist awareness!), but not so sure I see quite why it won the Newbery Medal. Yet. It may or may not become apparent later. But mid-way through I suddenly noticed how surprisingly many of the books are anthropomorphic: Watership Down; Aesop's Fables; The Wind in the Willows; The Mouse and his Child; The Jungle Book, Winnie the Pooh, Mrs. Frisby, Black Beauty, Blitzcat (I think, from reading the description on Amazon - don't know about Yaxley's Cat) and Charlotte's Web. That's leaving out the Potter and other picture books, which are more often talking animals/dolls/whatever, I'd have thought. 10 out of 14, and possibly 11. Yet there's no other type of fantasy immediately apparent, and just the one science fiction. And there's plenty of fantasy in later courses. Okay - that was stupid, as there are collections of fairy tales, but nothing else in the chapter books.
Want to take on DWJ on Hilary McKay's Permanent Rose, but now is clearly not the time, no matter how much absencia she might be in. Instead I'll content myself with an entirely apropos quote about appropriate children's reading from Moominpappa's Memoirs, which I'm reading thanks to
The children chorused, '"This - is - One-eyed - Bob's - sanguinary - work" - remarked - Inspector - Twiggs - pulling - a - three-inch - nail - from - the - ear - of - the - corpse - "it - must - have - happened" ---'
Quite, quite, as the Mymble said in response...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 01:43 pm (UTC)I haven't read the book, but from what I know of Jones, this isn't a book review, it's a very painful flashback. I had a very similar response to Jones's Time of the Ghost for all of the reasons Jones is uncomfortable with Permanent Rose. Too close to home, to sanguine an ending.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 02:00 pm (UTC)Oof - I'll be more coherent when I'm not feeling quite so feverish. And don't have to drive out to pick up daughter...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 02:32 pm (UTC)Oh speaking of Newbery novels, was so glad the other day, an acquaitance just mentioned in her blog as her childhood favorite the first library book I ever read and one of my total childhood favorites, and apparently it won a Newbery prize in the 1930s! The Forgotten Daughter (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/9997489179), I don´t think it survives in literary analysis, but it was a kick to find at least 3 of us who do love it still very much.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 11:00 pm (UTC)if one of the target audiences is the kind of mistreated child depicted in the book,
then presumably it is fair for someone who has survivied precisely that kind of upbringing to say
"no, this book is too cosy"
for I think one of the things Jones is saying is that "friends can compensate for family but never susbtitute for them" and that for McKay to say so is problematic.
I understand this. I remember the first time I hever heard the sentence: "Family is where you go when you have nowhere left because they can't turn you away."
Hearing it was like a blow to the stomach, a sudden revelation of what I didn't have.
(I'm not adopted or in care, I just have a mother remarkably like the one Jones describes so often in her work. Self focussed and utterly unsuitable to motherhood. Mind you, she did a decent job in other ways, I wouldn't want this to be misread.)
I'll try to pick up the book today or tomorrow and comment then.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 12:22 am (UTC)(I didn't misunderstand what you were saying, btw, and had none too cozy a childhood myself, though not through my mother being a DWJ mother at all.)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 02:09 pm (UTC)(Westall's "Futuretrack Five" is fantastic, btw; I so want my own copy of that. And his "Devil on the Road" is a very cool timeslip. I like Westall...can you tell?)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-09 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-10 03:49 pm (UTC)If I found that, maybe there's hope for all the Lost Books of the world...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 01:43 am (UTC)And I'll add looking for that review to my long "to-do" list - honestly, how can a week off-line make such a difference to my life?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 01:58 am (UTC)Knock looking for the review off the to-do list at least - I've got a link to it. ;) (I've been in bed almost since last post.) Looking forward to hearing about your conference.